Stigma Related to the Non-Medical Use and Diversion of Prescription Stimulant Drugs: Should We Care.

BACKGROUND: Non-medical use (NMU) and diversion of prescription stimulants are prevalent on college campuses. Diversion represents a primary source of acquisition for NMU among young adults. This study examined relationships between stigmatizing beliefs related to NMU and diversion of stimulant medications and engagement in these behaviors, as well as how such perceptions are associated with indicators of psychological distress among those who engage in these behaviors. METHODS: Young adults (N = 384) were recruited from a large US university to participate in this cross-sectional electronic survey-based study. Relationships between stigma variables and NMU and diversion were assessed. Among those who engage in NMU and diversion, we tested relationships between stigma variables and indicators of psychological distress, using validated instruments. RESULTS: Perceived social and personal stigmatic beliefs did not significantly predict NMU. However, perceived social and personal stigma of diversion significantly reduced diversion likelihood. For NMU, associations were found between stigma variables and indicators of psychological distress. Markedly, we found that as stigmatic perceptions of NMU increased, so did depressive, anxiolytic, and suicidal symptomatology among those who engage in NMU. CONCLUSIONS: Stigmatization does not deter NMU; however, stigmatization is positively associated with psychological harm among those who engage in NMU. Interventions should be developed to reduce stigmatization in order to improve psychological health among those who engage in NMU. Stigmatic perceptions of diversion were not predictive of psychological harm, though they are negatively associated with diversion behavior.

Gabapentin Use Among Individuals Initiating Buprenorphine Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder.

Importance: Gabapentin prescriptions have drastically increased in the US due to off-label prescribing in settings such as opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment to manage a range of comorbid conditions and withdrawal symptoms, despite a lack of evidence. Objective: To assess the purpose and associated risks of off-label gabapentin use in OUD treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective recurrent-event case-control study with a crossover design used administrative claims data from MarketScan Commercial and Multi-State Medicaid databases from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2016. Individuals aged 12 to 64 years with an OUD diagnosis and filling buprenorphine prescriptions were included in the primary analysis conducted from July 1, 2022, through June 1, 2023. Unit of observation was the person-day. Exposures: Days covered by filled gabapentin prescriptions. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were receipt of gabapentin in the 90 days after initiation of buprenorphine treatment and drug-related poisoning. Drug-related poisonings were defined using codes from International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision. Results: A total of 109 407 patients were included in the analysis (mean [SD] age, 34.0 [11.2] years; 60 112 [54.9%] male). Among the 29 967 patients with Medicaid coverage, 299 (1.0%) were Hispanic, 1330 (4.4%) were non-Hispanic Black, 23 112 (77.1%) were non-Hispanic White, and 3399 (11.3%) were other. Gabapentin was significantly less likely to be prescribed to Black or Hispanic patients, and more likely to be prescribed to female patients, those with co-occurring substance use or mood disorders, and those with comorbid physical conditions such as neuropathic pain. Nearly one-third of persons who received gabapentin (4336 [31.1%]) had at least 1 drug-related poisoning after initiating buprenorphine treatment, compared with 13 856 (14.5%) among persons who did not receive gabapentin. Adjusted analyses showed that days of gabapentin use were not associated with hospitalization for drug-related poisoning (odds ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.85-1.13]). Drug-related poisoning risks did not vary based on dosage. Conclusions and Relevance: Gabapentin is prescribed in the context of a myriad of comorbid conditions. Even though persons receiving gabapentin are more likely to have admissions for drug-related poisoning, these data suggest that gabapentin is not associated with an increased risk of drug-related poisoning alongside buprenorphine in adjusted analyses. More data on the safety profile of gabapentin in OUD settings are needed.

Associations Between Kratom-Related State Policy Environments and Kratom Use in a Nationally Representative Population in the United States.

Limited research has resulted in conflicting views on the risks versus benefits associated with kratom use. Despite no federal policy in the United States, individual states have implemented diverging policies through kratom bans, and legalization and regulation through Kratom Consumer Protection Acts (KCPAs). The Survey of Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs (NMURx) Program employs nationally-representative, repeated cross-sectional surveys on drug use. In 2021, weighted prevalence of past-12 month kratom use was compared across three state legal frameworks: no overarching state policy, KCPAs, and state bans. There was lower estimated prevalence of kratom use in banned states (prevalence: 0.75% (0.44, 1.06) relative to states with a KCPA (1.20% (0.89, 1.51)), and relative to states with no policies (1.04% (0.94, 1.13), though odds of use were not significantly associated with policy type. Kratom use was significantly associated with medicated treatment for opioid use disorder. While there were observed differences in the prevalence of past-12 month kratom use by state policy type, low uptake mitigated meaningful distinctions by limiting statistical precision, and potentially confounding effects, such as accessibility online. Future kratom-related policy decisions should be informed through evidence-based research.

Associations of Transactional Sex and Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Treatment-Seeking Individuals With Opioid Use Disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Coinciding with the rise in opioid use across the U.S., the rates of sexually transmitted infections have reached historically high levels, underscoring the need to understand multiple pathways of disease spread. Although prevention is often focused on injection-related behaviors, this study sought to identify the prevalence and associations of a little understood pathway, transactional sex, among individuals with opioid use disorder, including associations of transactional sex with the prevalence of sexually transmitted infection diagnoses. METHODS: Data were sourced from a nationwide opioid surveillance program of treatment-seeking individuals with opioid use disorder utilizing a serial, cross-sectional survey of 4,366 new entrants to 1 of 99 substance use treatment programs for opioid use disorder in 37 states from October 2018 to June 2021. RESULTS: A quarter of the sample (24.9%) self-reported a lifetime history of transactional sex for drugs, with rates highest for sexual (56.6%) and gender (53.8%) minority, female (33.4%), Latinx (30.4%), and Black (29.6%) subgroupings. Lifetime diagnoses of all specific sexually transmitted infections analyzed were significantly higher (p<0.001) among those reporting transactional sex, particularly syphilis (14.3% vs 4.4%) and HIV (4.0 vs 0.9%). Financial hardship, trauma, and psychiatric disorder were significantly associated with transactional sex engagement. CONCLUSIONS: Transactional sex is relatively common among patients with opioid use disorder, particularly among sexual/gender minorities, which was associated with a greater lifetime prevalence of all sexually transmitted infections assessed. Sexually transmitted infection testing remains at low levels within substance use treatment programs, occurring in just 26.3% of programs; sexual health screenings and sexually transmitted infection prevention/testing need to be prioritized and integrated into opioid use disorder patient care.

Young Adult Nightclub Participants Who Attend Adult Entertainment Clubs: Sexual Risk and Substance Use Behaviors.

This secondary analysis of cross-sectional baseline data from an intervention trial study examines demographics, sexually transmitted infection (STI) history, substance use and sexual risk behaviors among young adult nightclub participants who do (n = 79) and do not (n = 419) frequent "strip" or adult entertainment clubs (AECs) in Miami, Florida. AEC patrons were older, and more likely to identify as Black race and report STI history. Compared to those who do not, AEC patrons also reported greater recent (past 90-day) frequencies of alcohol and ecstasy use, higher numbers of recent sex partners and were more likely to report recently being high during sex a majority of the time. Increased HIV/STI prevention efforts among young adult AEC patrons appear warranted.

Understanding motivations and use typologies of gabapentin with opioid agonist medications.

BACKGROUND: Prior research suggests a potential relationship between the nonmedical use of gabapentin and use of opioid agonist medications (OAMs), buprenorphine and methadone. However, this research has been limited in scope and understanding despite increases in gabapentin prescribing in opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment settings and increased detection in opioid overdose fatalities. METHODS: Data were analyzed for 346 participants of a follow-up program to an ongoing national opioid surveillance program of new entrants to treatment for opioid use disorder. Data were sourced from a cross-sectional online survey distributed in July/August 2021. RESULTS: Lifetime exposure to gabapentin was reported by 60.0 % of the sample, while lifetime history of nonmedical use was reported by 43.2 %. Of those nonmedically using gabapentin, 50.0 % did so while also on a dosage of either buprenorphine or methadone, with 28.4 % engaged in concurrent nonmedical use of both gabapentin and OATs. Motivations for concurrent nonmedical use included high-seeking (38.6 %), self-management of pain/physical symptoms (33.3 %), and self-management of OUD (22.2 %). CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin exposure in treatment-seeking persons with OUD appears to be quite common, and use, both medically and nonmedically, frequently occurs alongside OAMs. Motivations for concurrent nonmedical use of gabapentin and OATs mirrors motivations for off-label prescribing by healthcare providers, but may also serve as a form of self-management of OUD when OAM regimens are interrupted, insufficiently prescribed or prescribed at insufficient dosages. Further research should seek to understand the risks versus benefits of gabapentin in OAM treatment settings.

Nonmedical use of gabapentin and opioid agonist medications in treatment-seeking individuals with opioid use disorder.

BACKGROUND: As prescriptions for gabapentin have increased in recent years, nonmedical use and risk of adverse outcomes (e.g., hospitalizations and overdose) have been identified, particularly in association with opioids, including opioid agonist medications (OAMs) buprenorphine and methadone. However, there is a lack of systematic, nationwide data assessing the relationship between the nonmedical use of gabapentin and OAMs. METHODS: Data were sourced from two nationwide opioid surveillance programs of treatment-seeking individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). Both programs utilized an identical serial, cross sectional survey of 12,792 new entrants to one of 163 substance use treatment programs for OUD in 46 states and the District of Columbia from January 2019 to December 2020. RESULTS: Past month nonmedical use of gabapentin was endorsed by 9.3% of the sample. Of those using gabapentin nonmedically, 64.1% also endorsed nonmedical use of an OAM, including concomitant use of methadone (35.3%), and buprenorphine (49.0%). Concomitant nonmedical use of gabapentin and OAMs was more prevalent (versus nonmedical use of gabapentin alone) in the Southern region, among those living in a street dwelling, those with chronic pain and healthcare professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Nonmedical use of gabapentin in people with OUD appears to frequently coincide with nonmedical use of OAMs. As prescriptions and off-label use of gabapentin increase, provider education should include the risks of concomitant gabapentin and OAM use, particularly amongst buprenorphine prescribers. Future research should investigate motivations (e.g., OUD self-management) for nonmedical use of gabapentin and OAMs within the context of OUD treatment access and retention.

Increasing rates of buprenorphine diversion in the United States, 2002 to 2019.

PURPOSE: Recent reports suggest that buprenorphine is being diverted and used non-medically. However, no apparent studies have reported national-level data on buprenorphine diversion. METHODS: Case report data were drawn from a quarterly survey of prescription drug diversion completed by a national sample of law enforcement and regulatory agencies who engage in drug diversion investigations. Quarterly rates of buprenorphine diversion per 100 000 population and 100 000 prescriptions dispensed were calculated for the period 2002 through 2019. Population-based diversion rates were also calculated by U.S. region. RESULTS: In total, 9670 cases of diverted buprenorphine were reported across all 50 states and the District of Columbia during the study period. Buprenorphine diversion rates, per 100 000 population, were characterized by an accelerating increase over time; increases in diversion rates from 1st quarter 2002 through 4th quarter 2006 were not statistically significant, yet from 1st quarter 2007 through 4th quarter 2019, the rate of diversion cases increased by 0.0067 cases per 100 000 per quarter (p < 0.001). Buprenorphine diversion rates per 100 000 prescriptions dispensed indicated a gradual increase over time; from 3rd quarter 2010 through 4th quarter 2019, diversion rates showed a statistically significant increase of 0.28 cases (p = 0.037) per quarter on average. The Northeast was the only region that did not observe an increase in the average quarterly change in buprenorphine diversion rates after 2006. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study illustrate longitudinal national trends of increasing buprenorphine diversion. Continued systematic surveillance of this phenomenon is needed.

Ride hailing app use and drunk/drugged driving among young adult nightclub patrons.

OBJECTIVE: Nightclub patrons who consume alcohol and drugs in these venues would appear to be an important population to target with on-demand ride hailing app (RHA) services to reduce drunk/drugged driving (DUI). The present study is an exploratory examination of RHA use to avoid DUI behavior, as well as the perceived barriers and benefits of such RHA use, among young adult nightclub patrons in Miami who use drugs. METHODS: Completers of a 2011-2015 randomized controlled trial of brief interventions to reduce health risk behaviors among young adult nightclub patrons were recruited to participate in a single self-administered computer-assisted interview about health risks, driving behaviors, and RHA perceptions and use. Recruitment (N = 123) began in June 2016 and ended in July 2017. Bivariable logistic regression and ANOVA models examined group differences between: (a) those who had used an RHA to avoid DUI vs. not; and (b) those who used RHAs as their primary mode of transportation to nightclubs vs. not. RESULTS: About half were female (52.8%); median age was 29; 59.4% Hispanic, 31.7% Black, 8.1% white, 0.8% other race/ethnicity. Recent alcohol and marijuana use were almost universally endorsed, and more than half reported recent use/misuse of cocaine (72.4%), MDMA (63.4%), and prescription benzodiazepines (62.6%) and opioids (56.9%). More than 80% reported driving under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs in the past 12 months, and 17.1% experienced a DUI arrest in the prior two years. Almost two-thirds (65.9%) of participants had used an on-demand RHA to avoid DUI, but self-driving or riding in another's car were the most common (76.4%) primary modes of transportation to clubs. RHAs were the primary mode of travel to clubs for 21 (17.1%) respondents. Participants whose friends strongly disapproved of DUI were more than twice as likely to have used RHAs for this reason compared to those who had not done so. Those reporting RHA use to avoid DUI were less likely than others to have driven under the influence in the past 12 months and were somewhat more likely to endorse DUI-related risks. Those who used alternate modes of transportation were more likely than those who used RHAs as their primary mode of transportation to clubs to endorse the expense of RHAs and the lack of RHA drivers near their favorite clubs as barriers to RHA use to travel to nightclubs. CONCLUSIONS: This novel study among a high-risk population points to the potential for on-demand RHAs to reduce DUI behaviors and arrests among young adult nightclub patrons who consume alcohol and/or drugs in the context of the club experience. Our findings point to key educational, peer support, and structural targets for intervention to increase the use of RHAs among this population, specifically, club-based incentives for increasing RHA availability and affordability. Research is needed to fully elucidate the findings of this exploratory study, including potential differences in intervention approaches depending on the location-specific public transportation options.

Descriptions of Gabapentin Misuse and Associated Behaviors among a Sample of Opioid (Mis)users in South Florida.

Gabapentin has received increased attention due to a growing number of reports of misuse and diversion. However, significant details about gabapentin misuse are scant. Data are drawn from a mixed-methods study examining gabapentin misuse in South Florida. The sample includes 49 respondents who were age 18 or over and reported past year use of illicit opioids and/or the misuse of prescription opioid medications, as well as, recent (past 90 days) gabapentin misuse. Respondents were female (40.8%), Hispanic (30.6%), Black (16.3%), white (49.0%), and other race/ethnicity (4.1%). Mean age was 37.6. Many respondents (43%) misused gabapentin without ever receiving a prescription and 14% misused prior to being prescribed. Mean frequency of recent misuse was 25.4 days and included a mean of 51.65 pills/doses. Prevalent routes of administration included swallowing (85.7%) and snorting (10.2%). Gabapentin misuse occurred concomitantly with any opioid (44.9%), benzodiazepines (38.8%), alcohol (24.5%), and powder cocaine (24.5), among others. Respondents' descriptions indicate that gabapentin produces feelings reminiscent of alcohol intoxication or opioid-induced euphoria, but for some it produces no noticeable effect or only alleviates pain. Greater understanding of gabapentin misuse, especially associated behaviors and concomitant use is needed to inform prevention and intervention efforts, and to guide policy approaches.

A Qualitative Examination of Gabapentin Misuse Inside of Treatment and Recovery Settings.

OBJECTIVE: Gabapentin, an anti-convulsant medication used to treat seizures and neuralgia, is also prescribed off-label for the treatment of substance use disorders and withdrawal symptoms in treatment settings. Yet, reports of gabapentin misuse are increasing in the United States. The present study examines the misuse of gabapentin in treatment and transitional living facility settings. METHOD: Data are drawn from a study examining gabapentin misuse in South Florida. The sample includes 34 adult participants who reported past-year use of illicit opioids and/or the misuse of prescription opioid medications, as well as histories of gabapentin misuse and treatment for substance use disorder. Data analyses included descriptive and in vivo coding schemes and used a descriptive qualitative approach. RESULTS: Participants were female (26.5%), White (67.6%), African American/Black (5.9%), Hispanic (20.6%), Asian (2.9%), and other race/ethnicity (2.9%). Mean age was 31.6 years. Findings indicate that inside of treatment and recovery settings, gabapentin misuse occurs as individuals attempt to get high or cope with withdrawal or mental distress symptoms, and one quarter of participants perceived no benefit in misusing gabapentin. Participants also described the concept of "freelapse" (i.e., justifying the misuse of prescribed gabapentin and still considering oneself to be sober). Gabapentin misuse inside of transitional living facilities is common because of limited supervision and screening. CONCLUSIONS: Continued research is needed to understand the risk factors for gabapentin misuse and any potential benefits for continued gabapentin administration among treatment patients. Efforts to mitigate gabapentin misuse, including increased supervision and screening in treatment facilities, appear warranted.

Factors Associated with Gabapentin Misuse among People Who Inject Drugs in Appalachian Kentucky.

AIMS: Gabapentin is misused to potentiate the euphoric effects of opioids, self-treat physical pain, and moderate opioid withdrawal symptoms. Because examinations of gabapentin misuse among people who inject drugs (PWID) are scant, the aim of this study is to identify factors associated with gabapentin misuse among this population. Methods: Data are drawn from a study examining the uptake of syringe service programs (SSPs) in Appalachian Kentucky. The sample includes 324 PWID who were age 18 and over and reported past month drug injection. Logistic regression models were constructed to examine recent (past 90 days) gabapentin misuse. Results: Participants are female (50.0%); Hispanic (2.2%), Black (1.5%), white (90.7%), and other race/ethnicity (4.6%). Mean age is 37. Participants reporting gabapentin misuse had higher odds of reporting (mis)use of marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamine, prescription opioids, benzodiazepines, prescription stimulants, fentanyl, and buprenorphine (p < .042); severe substance use disorder (p < .000); and recent physical pain (p < .003). In multivariable models, findings related to misuse of prescription opioids and buprenorphine; severe substance use disorder; and recent physical pain or discomfort, remained significant (p < .042). Conclusions: This is one of the first studies to examine gabapentin misuse among PWID. It is possible that individuals reporting recent gabapentin misuse are attempting to self-treat physical pain when healthcare is limited. Gabapentin may also be misused to achieve desired central nervous system effects and to potentiate opioid highs. Syringe service programs can educate PWID about the potential dangers of polydrug use involving gabapentin and to connect PWID with needed healthcare services.

Preliminary Evidence of Pregabalin Misuse among Prescription and/or Illicit Opioid (Mis)users.

Pregabalin is approved for the management of neuropathic pain, partial-onset seizures, and fibromyalgia. Although it is considered to have low potential for abuse, reports of misuse of pregabalin are emerging. The present study contributes to this literature by presenting preliminary evidence of pregabalin misuse. Mixed method interviews were conducted with prescription and/or illicit opioid (mis)users who reported a history of pregabalin misuse (N = 5). During semi-structured interviews, respondents provided descriptions of this practice, including motivation, route of administration, source, and drugs used/misused in combination with pregabalin. Motivations for pregabalin misuse included the self-treatment of physical pain (N = 1) and to achieve a desired psychoactive effect and/or combat opioid withdrawal symptoms (N = 4). Respondents described the misuse of pregabalin to potentiate the effects of heroin and cocaine, to feel "tipsy," and to experiment. We believe this report represents the first detailed contextual data about the misuse of pregabalin in the U.S. These misuse practices may represent an early indication of a growing problem. The recent permissibility of lower price generic versions has the potential to increase availability, decrease prices, and exacerbate pregabalin misuse.

The Social Environmental Context of Resilience Among Substance-Using African American/Black Men Who Have Sex With Men.

Resilience theory has been suggested as a framework for research on HIV prevention among men who have sex with men. Among this population, literature indicates that African American/Black men who have sex with men experience additional health disparities including elevated HIV incidence rates, victimization, and poor physical health. Conceptualizing resilience as a part of one's social environment, this qualitative study investigates resilience processes and HIV transmission risk among a sample of 21 substance-using African American/Black men who have sex with men. Data from in-depth interviews describe the social environmental context in which resilience is exhibited and document the influence of homophobia, expressions of agency, and access to social, economic, and cultural capital on resilience processes. Central to this are expressions of hidden resilience, in which African American/Black men who have sex with men mitigate risk and experience their lives as subjectively successful, whether or not outsiders see it as such.

An ethnographic decision model of the initiation of gabapentin misuse among prescription and/or illicit opioid (mis)user.

AIMS: Gabapentin is used in the treatment of seizures and neuralgia, and it is prescribed off-label to treat substance use disorders and withdrawal symptoms. Recent research documents misuse of gabapentin, especially among prescription opioid misusers. The present study contributes to this literature by examining the initiation of gabapentin misuse. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with prescription and/or illicit opioid (mis)users who reported a history of gabapentin misuse (N = 62) and who did not (N = 29). During semi-structured interviews, respondents provided descriptions of the first time they misused gabapentin. An ethnographic decision model was constructed to illustrate the factors that influence the initiation decision. RESULTS: Multiple individual, social, and environmental factors influence the decision to initiate gabapentin misuse. Respondents described the initiation decision related to: a) wanting to feel a psychoactive high during times of limited access to one's preferred drug because of institutional barriers (e.g., substance abuse treatment; jail; transitional living facility; N = 18); b) the desire to use multiple drugs, including for experimentation or to potentiate another substance (N = 18); and c) the need to self-treat withdrawal symptoms during periods of opioid nonuse or when opioids were unavailable (N = 16). Respondents also initiated gabapentin misuse to self-treat physical pain (N = 10). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple approaches are needed to mitigate gabapentin misuse, including limiting availability in institutional settings and informal channels as well as addressing the needs of drug users who experience physical pain and withdrawal symptoms. Continued research is needed to examine therapeutic uses of gabapentin and behaviors related to misuse.

Gabapentin prescribed during substance abuse treatment: The perspective of treatment providers.

BACKGROUND: Gabapentin, a prescription medication approved for the treatment of seizures and neuralgia, is often prescribed off-label for substance use treatment, mental health problems, and pain. Emerging reports also suggest it is misused for the purpose of getting high. The present study examines substance abuse treatment provider key informants' experiences with gabapentin prescribed to clients in treatment. The focus of this exploratory study is to ascertain how gabapentin is used in these settings and the benefits and risks for clients. METHODS: Key informants from South Florida participated in confidential, in-depth interviews (N = 12). Data analyses included descriptive and in vivo coding schemes and employed a descriptive qualitative approach. RESULTS: All key informants recognized the benefits of prescribing gabapentin to clients in treatment for problems related to withdrawal symptoms, mental distress and pain. At the same time, half of participants described gabapentin misuse among clients and four key informants described such misuse as a first marker of relapse. Key informants also stated that more research must be done about how to use gabapentin effectively in treatment settings. CONCLUSIONS: These findings illustrate the lack of clarity about the efficacy of administration of gabapentin in treatment settings. Additional research about how to best use gabapentin, for whom it may be beneficial, and the effect of prescribed gabapentin on addiction recovery is needed.

Brief interventions for young adults who use drugs: The moderating effects of resilience and trauma.

Among participants in an intervention clinical trial (N = 602), we examined resilience as a moderator of substance use outcomes by intervention condition and between participants with and without severe traumatic stress (STS). Eligibility included men and women ages 18-39 with recent multidrug use; drug treatment enrollees were excluded. Outcome measures were past 90-day frequencies of substance use and abstinence. Putative moderators were measured using the Resilience Research Centre's Adult Resilience Measure (RRC-ARM) and the Traumatic Stress Scale from the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN). Analyses employed hierarchical linear models. High resilience predicted better substance use outcomes, and the ordering of intervention effects for high resilience participants was stepwise by intervention condition intensity. Participants with low resilience scores had poorer outcomes, and those outcomes were largely unaffected by intervention condition. Participants without STS experienced the interventions similarly to the overall sample. Regardless of the level of resilience, however, participants with STS did not benefit from the interventions. The findings point to the importance of screening for both resilience and traumatic stress prior to intervention to maximize the impact of brief interventions for substance users, and also to link those needing more intensive approaches to additional services and professional care.

The diversion of nonscheduled psychoactive prescription medications in the United States, 2002 to 2017.

PURPOSE: Systematic studies of the diversion of nonscheduled drugs, except for gabapentin, are not apparent. We searched diversion case reports of all other nonscheduled psychoactive prescription drugs in the Researched Abuse, Diversion, and Addiction-Related Surveillance (RADARS) System. METHODS: Case report data are drawn from a quarterly survey of prescription drug diversion completed by a national sample of law enforcement and regulatory agencies. Rates of diversion per 100 000 population were calculated for each year from 2002 to 2017 for prescription medications with greater than 400 reported cases during the period. RESULTS: Cyclobenzaprine, quetiapine, and trazodone met criteria for analysis. We found a significant and steady increase in the diversion of each drug over the period. The 2017 annual rates of diversion per 100 000 population for the three medications range from 0.0428 to 0.0726. Although these rates of diversion are much lower than the rate for total opioid analgesics, they are all more than five times higher in 2017 compared with 2002. While diversion rates for opioids have decreased in recent years, rates for cyclobenzaprine, quetiapine, and trazodone have continued to increase. CONCLUSIONS: A common attribute of the three nonscheduled drugs studied here is that all are used for the treatment and/or self-treatment of opioid withdrawal symptoms, and the increasing diversion of these drugs may be related to the ongoing opioid epidemic and to increasing levels of control over pharmaceutical opioid availability in the United States. Prescribers need to be aware of illicit markets for these medications and prescribe to their patients with appropriate caution.

Foster care, syndemic health disparities and associations with HIV/STI diagnoses among young adult substance users.

OBJECTIVES: Foster care history is associated with many health and social problems, including sexual risk behaviours, HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). This cross-sectional study compares sexual risk behaviours among a sample of young adult substance users in Miami (N=602) with and without foster care histories. METHODS: Participants completed a comprehensive assessment which included sections on foster care, sexual risk behaviours and related health and social problems. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between foster care history, associated syndemic vulnerabilities and increased likelihood of having a prior HIV/STI diagnosis. RESULTS: Bivariate analyses indicated that foster care alumni were more likely to report a prior HIV/STI diagnosis, higher condomless sex frequencies, being high on alcohol or drugs during sex, sexual victimisation and a history of homelessness compared with other participants in the sample (p<0.05). Multivariate analyses revealed that foster care history, sexual victimisation and group sex participation are associated with a prior HIV/STI diagnosis (p<0.05). Group sex participation doubled the odds of a prior HIV/STI diagnosis for foster care alumni, compared with other participants (p<0.5). CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study identifies characteristics that distinguish foster care alumni from non-alumni and signals the need to better serve the sexual and related health needs of individuals with foster care histories. Clinicians and healthcare providers should provide foster care alumni with detailed HIV/STI risk reduction information and resources and services to address related syndemic vulnerabilities (eg, victimisation and homelessness).